Lamb, Meters. E., & Gilbride, K. Into the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and in conflict relationship (pp. 33-60). New york: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]

Lee, L., Loewenstein, G., Ariely, D., Hong, J., & Younger, J hot sexy Siem reap girls. (2008). In the event that I’m not sensuous, are you sexy or otherwise not?: Physical-attractiveness feedback and you will relationships tastes once the a purpose of one’s individual attractiveness. Emotional Research, 19, 669677. [ Website links ]

Levinger, G., & Rands, Meters. (1985)patibility in marriage or other intimate dating. In the W. Ickes (Ed.), Suitable and you will incompatible dating (pp. 309-331). Ny: Springer-Verlag. [ Backlinks ]

Lewin, K., Dembo, T., Festinger, L., & Sears, P. (1944). Quantity of aspiration. When you look at the J. McV. Appear (Ed.), Identification as well as the behavior disorders (Vol. step 1, pp. 333378). Nyc: Ronald Drive. [ Backlinks ]

Loving, T. J. (2006). Predicting matchmaking relationship destiny having insiders’ and you will outsiders’ perspective: Which and you can what is actually expected things. Individual Dating, 13, 349-362. [ Website links ]

Luo, S., & Klohnen, Age. C. (2005). Assortative mating and marital quality when you look at the newly weds: A couple centered strategy. Record out-of Character and you may Social Mindset, 88, 304-326. [ Links ]

Lutz-Zois, C. J., Bradley, An excellent. C., Mihalik, J. L., & Moorman-Eavers, E. Roentgen. (2006). Sensed resemblance and you can dating triumph certainly matchmaking lovers: An idiographic approach. [ Hyperlinks ]

Madden, Yards., & Lenhart, A good. (2006). Internet dating. Washington, DC: Statement on Pew Web sites & American Lives Venture. Recovered , out of [ Backlinks ]

MacDonald, T. K., & Ross, Yards. (1999). Evaluating the precision out of predictions regarding relationships relationship: How and why would lovers’ predictions change from men and women created by observers? Identity and you may Societal Psychology Bulletin, twenty five, 14171429. [ Website links ]

ater, J., & Smith, S. (1982). Legitimizing circumstances in the initiation away from heterosexual dating. Report presented at Very first Internationally Conference to the Individual Dating, Madison, WI. [ Backlinks ]

Diary regarding Personal and personal Relationships, 23, 865-880

Montoya, Roentgen. M., Horton, Roentgen. S., & Kirchner, J. (2008). Are actual similarity essential destination? Good meta-studies of actual and thought of similarity. Diary away from Public and private Matchmaking, twenty-five, 889-922. [ Website links ]

Digital relationships and you may digital relating: Conceptualizing desktop mediated intimate relationships

Morry, Meters. Yards. (2005). Dating satisfaction because an excellent predictor out-of resemblance product reviews; A test of your own destination-resemblance hypothesis. Journal out of Social and personal Dating, twenty two, 561-584. [ Links ]

Morry, Meters. Yards. (2007). The newest interest-resemblance theory certainly one of cross-intercourse nearest and dearest: Dating pleasure, imagined parallels, and mind-helping thinking. Log of Personal and private Relationships, twenty four, 117-138. [ Website links ]

Murstein, B. We. (1987). An explanation and you will expansion of your own SVR principle regarding dyadic combining. Log out of ily, forty-two, 929-947. [ Website links ]

Orbuch, T. L., Veroff, J. Hassan, H., & Horrocks, J. (2002). Who can breakup: A beneficial fourteen-12 months longitudinal examination of black lovers and white people. Diary out-of Personal and personal Relationships, 19, 179-202. [ Backlinks ]

Orenstein, S. (). The brand new love algorithm Meets believes it’s located a formula to own ruling the internet relationship providers: A technological approach to finding Mr. or Ms. Right. Organization 2.0 Journal. Recovered towards regarding [ Links ]

Rammstedt, B., & Schupp, J. (2008). Just the congruent endure – Identification parallels in the lovers. Character and you can Personal Variations, forty-five, 533-535. [ Backlinks ]

Regan, P. C., Levin, L., Sprecher, S., Christopher, S., & Cate, R. (2000). Lover preferences: What properties carry out anyone attract inside their brief-name sexual and you will enough time-identity close people? Record regarding Mindset and you may Person Sexuality, several, 1-21. [ Website links ]

Reis, H. T. (1985). The newest part of notice on the initiation and you can course of public telecommunications. In W. Ickes (Ed.), Compatible and you will in conflict matchmaking (pp. 209-231). Nyc: Sprinter-Verlag. [ Website links ]